Manufacturing cosmetics products in accordance with GMP guidelines is a
costly business. We felt it would be helpful to look at a 3-year-old
project to introduce cosmetics GMP by way of a quality management system.
The change to the definition of the word
"cosmetics" that was introduced with the 6th Amendment brought
the production of cleansing wipes manufactured by Hakle-Kimberley in
Mainz, Germany, within the scope of the EU Cosmetics Directive.
As a result the company decided to structure
their GMP procedures around a quality management system based on the
guidelines laid down by the IKW. External consultants, Concept of
Heidelberg, were engaged to help by bringing an independent view, and with
the aim of outsourcing as much of the project as possible.
By way of an initial review based on the IKW
self-assessment checklist plus questionnaires filled in by R & D,
manufacturing and sub-contracting, purchasing and sales, the company's
current operating procedures were analysed to evaluate them against GMP
standards.
Employee motivation – the A to Z of it.
After six-month period of structuring and
implementation the QM handbook took effect in October 1998. At first there
was hardly any change in the behaviour of the employees. They were at this
time still not aware that they themselves constituted a large part of the
QM system. It was only after repeated training sessions that they began to
"live" the concept.
Introducing the QM system meant on the one
hand additional written procedures, but on the other hand doubling up on
jobs such as record keeping disappeared. When the system was first
introduced the employees were very slow in handling the new documentation.
Real acceptance was ultimately achieved when the documentation had to be
used to trace an error. From the point of view of user motivation it
became clear that SOPs (standard operating procedures) were much more
readily accepted if they were written by those using them, rather than
asking them to accept a "foreign" SOP. This was particularly
obvious in the production area where the SOPs were written by the
production manager. Their full integration took longer there than in other
departments.
The transition was simplified by the unified
layout of the documents, which meant that every employee could quickly
find his way around the relevant paperwork. A proper GMP-conforming
documentation system was set up by nominating a central co-ordinator for
distribution, collection and archiving. This was the only way to ensure
that all of the necessary documents were available in the right place, and
in the latest version.
A newly introduced monitoring programme,
consisting of regular 6-weekly inspections by an outside body, is the key
to a critical review of performance (even of the most obvious things) and
to identifying potential weakness. A follow-up process ensures the
necessary improvements are made.
The incorporation of the R & D area into
the GMP system has also led to significant improvements. A structured
approach has made R & D projects more transparent and they are more
efficiently carried out along project management lines. The QM system
provided the opportunity to redefine the point of product handover, and
there are now clearly defined lines of responsibility.
It has become easier to maintain critical
raw material specifications, with only properly controlled up-to-date
documents being used, which are signed by the suppliers. Both parties are
clearly and unequivocally aware of their area of responsibility.
The external audits and the monitoring
programme critically evaluate the practical introduction of the QM system
and lead to the incorporation of improvements.
Thanks to the structured procedures that the
QM system requires, and GMP training for the employees, there have been a
lot fewer errors. They are now picked up much sooner, meaning that the
cost of errors is reduced.
The staff now "live" the QM
system, and as part of the process of continuous improvement they
themselves now draw attention to any loopholes in GMP procedures. After
the usual teething problems the QM system has been accepted and the
personnel now feel part of it, with the positive results described above.
Hakle-Kimberley is planning to extend the QM system to all of its European
plants.
Authors:
Dipl-Biol Sven Pommeranz, CONCEPT HEIDELBERG, Heidelberg
Dr Frank-Michael Tesky, Hakle-Kimberley Deutschland GmbH & Co., Mainz
|